Systematic review reports 20% to over 50% efficiency gains from optimized furrow irrigation in short-cycle crops, highlighting the value of advanced simulation models.
Furrow irrigation is widely practiced in arid and semi-arid regions but suffers from low efficiency due to infiltration variability and water losses. This systematic review analysed 92 peer-reviewed studies (2017–2024) on short-cycle crops, identified through a reproducible search of five bibliographic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect) supplemented by a manually directed search of publisher platforms, following Kitchenham & Charters’ protocol. Study quality was assessed narratively, based on validation against field data and comparison with established simulation software (SIRMOD, WinSRFR), rather than through a formal quality-appraisal tool. The narrative synthesis indicates that optimized irrigation techniques achieve efficiency gains ranging from 20% to over 50% relative to conventional practice, depending on crop, soil, and technology, addressing the two operational questions that determine furrow-irrigation performance: when to irrigate and how much water to apply. Advances were identified in coupled surface–subsurface modelling, soil moisture prediction, sensor-driven scheduling, and water–plant–atmosphere interaction. Persistent limitations include scarce field validation beyond single-furrow, single-season conditions, limited generalization across agroclimatic contexts, and interpretability challenges in machine learning (ML) models. Future research should prioritize embedding physical constraints into AI architectures, routine uncertainty quantification, multi-plot and multi-season validation, and pairing technological development with affordable hardware and farmer training to strengthen reproducibility and practical adoption in irrigation science.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caranqui-Sánchez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: