Pilot study demonstrates feasibility of smartphone-based 3D modeling for improved communication in surgery.
• Smartphone scans produced rapid 3D models of fresh head and neck specimens. • Annotated 3D models supported frozen section communication. • Surgeons and pathologists evaluated the approach positively. • Thickness measurements showed the largest soft-tissue deformation errors. (1) The complete resection of a solid tumor is a vital part of the current oncological therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in a complex anatomical region. Studies show that surgical resections of head and neck tumors are scarce or incomplete in up to 30–40%. This study investigates the feasibility of generating 3D models of the surface topography of the resected tumor using a mobile phone-based approach and implementing them into visualization software to improve communication between surgeons and pathologists during frozen section (FS) pathology. (2) Materials and Methods: We conducted a pilot study on 10 head and neck cancer patients undergoing surgical resection. A digital 3D model of the surface topography of fresh surgical specimens was created using a mobile phone with photogrammetry software and implemented into software to annotate regions of interest. Utility was assessed using a 0–5 Likert questionnaire completed by four pathologists and four head and neck surgeons; inter-rater reliability was quantified using average pairwise quadratic-weighted Cohen’s kappa. (3) Results: 3D model generation was feasible in 10/10 cases with a median scanning time of 4.2 min. A soft-tissue deformation experiment demonstrated good agreement in lateral dimensions but larger deviations in height consistent with soft-tissue compression. Both pathologists and surgeons rated the approach favorably, with an overall utility median of 4.2 (pathologists) and 4.8 (surgeons). (4) Discussion: Smartphone-based photogrammetry enables rapid 3D surface modeling of fresh head and neck specimens and can be integrated into dedicated software for orientation and communication during FS pathology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidl et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: