Inquiry into Marx's Capital reveals reading as evocacy for a future collective of the proletariat.
An inquiry into the structure of address in Marx's Capital, a book that is read by but not for the one reading it. Instead, a reader of Capital reads it for a collective that does not yet exist. What's more, it will always be read in a displacing way, insofar as, once the collective exists, it won't need to be read any longer. However, reading for the proletariat should not be confused with advocacy. Rather than advocacy, reading Capital is an act of evocacy, of reading the proletariat into existence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul North (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: