Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a structured AI business model representation using ISO standards, suggesting clearer application in business contexts.
This study proposes a standards-based Reference AI Business Model Canvas (Reference AI-BMC) that translates the use-case descriptors of ISO/IEC TR 24030 into the nine blocks of the Business Model Canvas, addressing the lack of a structured translation layer between AI standards and business-model design. Using ten selected fields of the ISO/IEC TR 24030 use-case template, a two-round Delphi process derives consensus-based mapping rules from expert judgments; Latent Dirichlet Allocation is used as a field-level semantic analysis to provide interpretive context for the Delphi-derived mappings. Primary mappings are reported as default translation references that met the 80% strict-consensus threshold, secondary mappings as context-dependent relations, and the adjudicated dual-mapping exception A5 (Threats/Challenges → Cost Structure) as a separately documented case. After converting the finalized primary mapping rules into a coding manual, three independent coders applied them to 81 AI use cases; the Layer 1 coding yielded Krippendorff’s α = 1.000, descriptively indicating no observed coder disagreement under the specified coding conditions. The Reference AI-BMC contributes a standards-based, consensus-derived translation layer for systematically organizing AI use cases in business-model terms, offering a structured starting point for early use-case workshops, preliminary portfolio screening, and standards-aware AI service design discussions. Together, these results position the Reference AI-BMC as a standards-based, consensus-derived reference layer for organizing AI use cases in BMC terms, with its applicability bounded by the ISO/IEC TR 24030 descriptor structure and the specified mapping procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: