Retrospective analysis evaluates tailored surgical techniques for improved outcomes in pancreatic neoplasms, highlighting effective strategies.
Background: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas (SPN-P) are rare, low-grade malignancies primarily affecting young women. While surgical resection is definitive, the optimal balance between oncological radicality and functional preservation remains a clinical challenge. This study evaluates tailored surgical strategies utilizing minimally invasive and parenchyma-preserving techniques. Patients and Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of SPN-P cases treated between March 2020 and May 2023. Out of 167 pancreatic resections, five paradigmatic cases were identified. We analyzed the decision-making process for preoperative staging (CT/MRI/EUS-FNB), surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic), and the implementation of parenchyma-preserving versus formal resections. Results: The cohort included four females and one male (mean age 40.6 years; range 13–73). Surgical approaches were tailored to tumor location and patient characteristics: two patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (one laparotomic, one laparoscopic), two underwent distal pancreatectomy (one robotic, one laparoscopic), and one pediatric patient underwent laparoscopic parenchyma-preserving central pancreatectomy. R0 resection was achieved in all cases. No Grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) or complications Clavien-Dindo ≥III occurred. At a mean follow-up (FU) of 38.4 months (range 20–58), the disease-free survival rate was 100%. One patient developed new-onset diabetes mellitus following distal pancreatectomy. Conclusions: A tailored surgical approach—integrating robotic, laparoscopic, and parenchyma-preserving techniques—may enable excellent oncological outcomes while minimizing morbidity. For SPN-P, the choice of procedure should prioritize the preservation of pancreatic function, particularly in young patients, without compromising surgical margins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pontrelli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: