Evaluates performance of core-shell nanofibers for radiation shielding, indicating enhanced efficiency and light weight.
The widespread application of nuclear technology in fields such as energy, medicine, and aerospace has driven the rapid development of high-performance X/γ-ray shielding materials. This work utilized radiation shielding simulation tools, WinXCom and Geant4, to simulate the X/γ-ray shielding performance of heavy-metal/rare-earth metal oxides. Based on the principle of complementary absorption edges, Bi2O3 and Sm2O3 were selected as the optimal shielding components. Three-dimensional models of electrospun membranes were established to systematically investigate the influence of different shielding configurations (single, blended, and core–shell structures) on their X/γ-ray shielding performance. Guided by simulation, coaxial electrospinning technology was employed to load Bi2O3 and Sm2O3 nanoparticles into the shell and core layers of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofibers, respectively, fabricating a hierarchical heteromorphic core–shell nanofibrous membrane (C-SNM). Owing to the complementary absorption characteristics and the multistage shielding attenuation mechanism, a 2 mm thick CSm-SBiNM (70 wt % filler loading) achieved an X-ray shielding efficiency of 52.54% at 80 kV, equivalent to 0.25 mm Pb, while its density was 0.492 g cm–3, merely 4.34% of the Pb plate (11.344 g cm–3). Without weight increase, component optimization and configuration design enhanced shielding performance of the CSm-SBiNM by about 4%, compared to a uniaxial nanofibrous membrane (UNM) with a disordered blended structure. Furthermore, the CSm-SBiNM exhibited a water vapor transmission rate of 6.582 kg m–2 d–1 and PM2.5 filtration efficiency exceeding 99.960%. The C-SNM combines efficient, broad-spectrum radiation protection with lightweight and moisture-permeable properties, overcoming the limitations of traditional rubber/plastic-based materials in this regard, and laying a foundation for next-generation radiation protection materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: