Key result
A quantitative exercise stress test score detected multivessel coronary artery disease with 94% specificity and 70% sensitivity for scores <0, improving upon conventional interpretation.
Why the study?
Does a quantitative grading score using multivariate discriminant analysis of exercise stress test variables improve the detection of multivessel coronary artery disease compared to conventional reporting?
Observational (n=111)
Does a quantitative grading score using multivariate discriminant analysis of exercise stress test variables improve the detection of multivessel coronary artery disease compared to conventional reporting?
A multivariate quantitative scoring system for exercise stress testing improves the diagnostic accuracy for detecting multivessel coronary artery disease compared to conventional interpretation.
May refine exercise test interpretation for multivessel CAD; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
A group of 111 male patients who had undergone maximal or symptom-limited maximal exercise stress testing for evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) were subjected to coronary angiography. Group I comprised 33 patients with normal or single-vessel disease (SVD), while 78 patients with double-vessel disease (DVD) or triple-vessel disease (TVD) formed Group II. On univariate analysis of the exercise test, the following variables were found to be of significance in discriminating between the two groups: age, exercise duration, double product (heart rate X systolic blood pressure) at peak exercise, duration of ST-segment depression, number of leads showing ST depression, ST depression of 1 mm or more, configuration of the depressed ST segment, and diastolic blood pressure response to exercise. Multivariate analysis however revealed that only the following five variables had significant discriminant power: number of leads showing ST depression, exercise duration, double product, diastolic pressure response, and ST-segment configuration. On the basis of their relative importance, a regression equation was developed to give a quantitative score to individual patients. A score of less than zero detected multivessel disease (MVD) with high specificity (94%) and sensitivity (70%), while a score of 15 or more almost excluded MVD (sensitivity 87%). The scoring system as reported here improved the exercise stress test interpretation when compared with the conventional reporting system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wasir et al. (1988) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=111). Quantitative grading score of exercise stress test vs. Conventional reporting system was evaluated on Detection of multivessel disease (MVD). A quantitative exercise stress test score detected multivessel coronary artery disease with 94% specificity and 70% sensitivity for scores <0, improving upon conventional interpretation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: