Why the study?
Does electrocardiographic chest wall mapping using 16 electrodes accurately detect coronary artery disease compared to coronary angiography in patients with chest pain suggestive of angina?
Does electrocardiographic chest wall mapping using 16 electrodes accurately detect coronary artery disease compared to coronary angiography in patients with chest pain suggestive of angina?
Electrocardiographic chest wall mapping with 16 electrodes during bicycle ergometry is a highly sensitive and specific non-invasive screening method for detecting significant coronary artery disease.
May support non-invasive CAD screening in chest pain; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Chest wall mapping of ST segment changes, inverted U waves, and Q waves using 16 electrocardiographic electrodes was performed at rest and during and after bicycle ergometry in 150 patients presenting with chest pain suggestive of angina. All patients underwent coronary angiography. The presence or absence of appreciable coronary artery disease (greater than or equal to 50% stenosis) was detected with a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 88%. The identification of lesions in individual coronary arteries was also possible with a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 85% respectively for the territory of the left anterior descending and diagonal artery, 71% and 85% respectively for the right coronary artery, and 85% and 80% respectively for the circumflex artery. This test appears to be a reliable non-invasive screening method for selecting patients for angiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salmasi et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: