Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Limited response to idiotype vaccination in patients with myeloma suggests that there is a need to develop better immunotherapy strategies. It has been determined that the number of high-potency CMRF44+CD14-CD19- dendritic cells (DCs) in the blood of patients with myeloma (range, 0.03%-0.8% of mononuclear cells [MNCs]; n = 26) was not significantly different from that in controls (range, 0.05%-0.8% of MNCs; n = 13). Expression of the costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 on DCs from these patients (mean, 29%+/-17% of MNCs and 85%+/-10% of MNCs, respectively) was also normal (mean, 29%+/-17% and 86%+/-16% of MNCs, respectively). Up-regulation of CD80 expression in response to stimulation by human huCD40LT + interleukin (IL)-2 was significantly reduced on the DCs of patients with myeloma during stable disease (n = 9) and was absent during progressive stages (n = 7) of disease. Similar effects were seen on B cells but not on monocytes of the same group of patients. CD86 expression on DCs was high before (86%) and after (89%) stimulation. Inhibition of CD80 up-regulation was neutralized by either anti-transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 or anti-IL-10. Up-regulation of CD80 on DCs of controls was inhibited by rTGF-beta1 in a dose-dependent manner. Serum TGF-beta1 and IL-10 levels were normal in most patients studied. Cytoplasmic TGF-beta1 was increased in plasma cells during progressive disease. Thus patients with myeloma have normal numbers of DCs, but CD80 expression may fail to be up-regulated in the presence of huCD40LT because of tumor-derived TGF-beta1 or IL-10. Autologous high-potency DCs may have to be tested for CD80 up-regulation and biologically modified ex vivo before idiotype priming for immunotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: