PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 22, 2026The American Journal of Medicine0 citations

Age-related efficacy of aspirin in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: START-ANTIPLATELET registry and meta-analysis of randomized trials

View Full Paper
EVEmanuele ValerianiRMRossella MarcucciMNMarcello Di Nisio

Key Result

Older age (≥65 years) was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving aspirin for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (RR 1.43; 95% CI 1.16-1.76).

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess how effective aspirin is for preventing coronary artery disease in different age groups.
  • Utilized the START-ANTIPLATELET registry alongside a meta-analysis of randomized trials
  • Included varied age demographics to analyze aspirin efficacy in secondary prevention
  • Aspirin significantly reduced coronary artery disease events in younger age groups compared to older ones
  • Effectiveness varied, indicating age influences the beneficial impact of aspirin on secondary prevention

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=410)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the efficacy of aspirin monotherapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease differ between patients aged ≥65 years and <65 years?

P
Population
410 patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome and treated with at least one month of aspirin monotherapy, alongside a meta-analysis of 58,394 participants.
E
Exposure
Aspirin monotherapy in older adults (age ≥65 years)
C
Comparator
Aspirin monotherapy in younger adults (age <65 years)
O
Outcome
Major adverse cardiovascular eventscomposite

Aspirin monotherapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease shows reduced efficacy in patients aged 65 years and older compared to younger patients.

Main Result

Relative Risk: 1.43 (95% CI 1.16–1.76)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Aspirin is a standard therapy for secondary prevention in coronary artery disease, yet its antiplatelet effect varies and incomplete thromboxane-A₂ inhibition has been shown in older individuals. Because no age threshold currently guides treatment, we investigated whether aspirin efficacy differs across predefined age cut-off in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS We analyzed data from START-ANTIPLATELET registry, a multicenter prospective registry of patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome and subsequently treated with at least one month of aspirin monotherapy. Patients were stratified by age ≥65 vs <65 years. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events, evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox regression. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effect of aspirin for secondary prevention in older versus younger adults. Pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model. RESULTS 410 patients were included in the registry, of whom 53.7% had ≥65 years. Patients aged ≥65 years exhibited a substantially higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events than younger patients, for an absolute increase of 5 events per 1,000 patient-months. Older age was associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 4.99, 95%CI 1.11-22.58) independently of other cardiovascular risk factors (hazard ratio 3.94, 95%CI 0.84-18.65). The meta-analysis of 58,394 participants from 19 trials confirmed the increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events among older individuals receiving aspirin compared with younger patients (RR 1.43, 95%CI 1.16-1.76). CONCLUSION The efficacy of aspirin monotherapy for secondary coronary artery disease prevention is reduced in elderly patients from 65 years of age onward.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Valeriani et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in coronary artery disease (n=410). Older age (≥65 years) vs. Younger age (<65 years) was evaluated on major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.76). Older age (≥65 years) was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving aspirin for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (RR 1.43; 95% CI 1.16-1.76).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ffaafd674f7c03778dcb9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2026.05.016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase I: A comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge.1987 · 2,256 citations
  2. 2Aspirin for primary prevention in diabetes mellitus: from the calculation of cardiovascular risk and risk/benefit profile to personalised treatment2015 · 22 citations
  3. 3Effect of fixed low-dose warfarin added to aspirin in the long term after acute myocardial infarction the LoWASA Study2004 · 60 citations
  4. 4ISAR-SAFE: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6 vs. 12 months of clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stenting2015 · 431 citations
  5. 5Six months versus 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DAPT-STEMI): randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial2018 · 185 citations