Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using mobile technology and experience sampling in junior high school, real-time motivation and engagement were explored at four-levels: between lessons (up to 2 lessons per day; Level 1), between days (5 days per week; L2), between weeks (4 weeks; L3), and between students (113 students; L4). Findings for a ‘random effects’ model revealed substantial variance between students (M = 67%), followed by variance between lessons (M = 29%), with little variance between days and between weeks (M = 2%). In a ‘fixed and random effects’ model, we explored the roles of prior general academic motivation and engagement as well as ability and socio-demographics. Findings revealed that prior general academic motivation and engagement played a significant role in students’ real-time motivation and engagement in mathematics and English and reduced between-student variance by about half. Gender (females), ability (high), and socioeconomic status (high) were also associated with higher real-time motivation and engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: