Why the study?
It was unknown whether combining several ECG abnormalities would identify general population subjects with a high risk of sudden cardiac death.
Does an ECG risk score predict sudden cardiac death in a general population?
Does an ECG risk score predict sudden cardiac death in a general population?
An ECG risk score combining five common abnormalities strongly predicts sudden cardiac death in the general population.
ECG abnormalities flag high SCD risk in general populations; hypothesis-generating for targeted prevention pending prospective trials.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether combining several ECG abnormalities would identify general population subjects with a high sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk. METHODS: In a sample of 6830 participants (mean age 51.2±13.9 years; 45.5% male) in the Mini-Finland Health Survey, a general population cohort representative of the Finnish adults aged ≥30 years conducted in 1978-1980, we examined their ECGs, following subjects for 24.3±10.4 years. We analysed the association between individual ECG abnormalities and 10-year SCD risk and developed a risk score using five ECG abnormalities independently associated with SCD risk: heart rate >80 beats per minute, PR duration >220 ms, QRS duration >110 ms, left ventricular hypertrophy and T-wave inversion. We validated the score using an external general population cohort of 10 617 subjects (mean age 44.0±8.5 years; 52.7% male). RESULTS: No ECG abnormalities were present in 4563 subjects (66.8%), while 96 subjects (1.4%) had ≥3 ECG abnormalities. After adjusting for clinical factors, the SCD risk increased progressively with each additional ECG abnormality. Subjects with ≥3 ECG abnormalities had an HR of 10.23 (95% CI 5.29 to 19.80) for SCD compared with those without abnormalities. The risk score similarly predicted SCD risk in the validation cohort, in which subjects with ≥3 ECG abnormalities had HR 10.82 (95% CI 3.23 to 36.25) for SCD compared with those without abnormalities. CONCLUSION: The ECG risk score successfully identified general population subjects with a high SCD risk. Combining ECG risk markers may improve the risk stratification for SCD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holkeri et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: