The article analyzes the relationship between general and professional self-efficacy of 1st year university students. General self-efficacy is considered as a personality trait that affects the choice of goals, the intensity of efforts aimed at achieving them and the effectiveness of activities in general. Professional self-efficacy determines the level of a person's aspirations in educational and professional activities. The study is based on the following hypothesis: general self-efficacy, previously formed in educational or other activities, is the basis for the formation of students' professional self-efficacy at the initial stage of professionalization. The analysis of empirical data showed that indicators of general self-efficacy of first-year students have significant positive correlations with indicators of professional self-efficacy. The assumption that a high level of general self-efficacy, regardless of the sources of its formation, has a positive effect on the development of professional self-efficacy of first-year students was partially confirmed. It has been found that significant correlations between indicators of general self-efficacy and professional self-efficacy are characteristic only of students with academic achievements. The absence of significant correlations between general and professional self-efficacy in students with achievements in the extracurricular sphere indicates that the general self-efficacy of first-year students continues to develop in isolation from their educational and professional activities. The results of the study can be used to develop professional self-efficacy trainings for first-year students. Students with high levels of general self-efficacy need support in performing educational and professional tasks. The development of professional self-efficacy of students with low levels of general self-efficacy will be facilitated by situations of success in educational and professional activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Музика et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: