Why the study?
The study evaluated the rate of new-onset AF and potential improved outcomes in HF patients using non-invasive remote patient management compared with usual care.
Does non-invasive remote patient management reduce days lost due to unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization or death in patients with chronic heart failure without baseline atrial fibrillation?
Does non-invasive remote patient management reduce days lost due to unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization or death in patients with chronic heart failure without baseline atrial fibrillation?
Non-invasive remote patient management with daily ECG transmission in heart failure patients significantly increases the detection of new-onset atrial fibrillation and reduces subsequent AF-related hospitalizations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reduces days lost from new AF in HF; extends RCT evidence for non-invasive RPM with daily ECG monitoring.
Aims To evaluate the rate of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and the potential improved outcome in heart failure (HF) patients using non-invasive remote patient management (RPM) compared with usual care (UC). Methods and results This analysis assessed a subgroup of 1538 patients of the TIM-HF2 trial with chronic HF, New York Heart Association Class II or III, admission to hospital for HF within 12 months before randomization, and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 45% or lower. Patients with AF in the baseline electrocardiogram (ECG), with an implanted cardiac device, a history of ablation therapy, and recent anticoagulation were excluded, leaving 347 patients for final analysis (RPM = 175; UC = 172). The percentage of days lost due to unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization or death of any cause (primary endpoint of TIM-HF2), the rate of newly detected AF, and the hospitalization rate due to AF were analysed. For patients with new AF, there was a significant reduction for the primary endpoint in the RPM group [5.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0–11.6 vs. UC: 14.6%, 95% CI 8.0–21.2; P < 0.001]. Within the first 3 months, the detection rate of new AF was significantly higher in the RPM group (5.1%) compared with UC (1.2%), P = 0.035. After 1 year, 23 patients (13.1%) assigned to RPM and 12 patients (7.0%) assigned to UC had newly detected AF, P = 0.056. Unplanned hospitalizations related to AF were significantly lower in the RPM group (2 out of 23 patients vs. UC: 10 out of 12 patients; P < 0.001). Conclusion In this subgroup of HF patients in the TIM-HF2 trial, non-invasive daily ECG transmission leads to a four times higher detection rate of new AF compared with UC. This was associated with a significant reduction of days lost due to unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations, especially hospitalizations related to AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stegmann et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: