Key result
Community-based exercise programs are linked to greater exercise confidence and smoother clinical transitions for CVD patients.
Why the study?
Physical activity levels typically decline following hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation, and multi-disease community-based exercise programmes may help maintain long-term positive health behaviours.
What are the patient experiences and factors influencing engagement in a multi-disease, community-based exercise programme following hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation?
Observational (n=24)
No
What are the patient experiences and factors influencing engagement in a multi-disease, community-based exercise programme following hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation?
Community-based exercise programs following cardiac rehabilitation provide an important transition and boost confidence through social comparison, but may inadvertently foster dependency rather than independent exercise habits.
May support transition and confidence post-rehabilitation; hypothesis-generating for sustained independence.
Background Exercise is the cornerstone of cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Hospital-based CR exercise programmes are a routine part of clinical care and are typically 6-12 weeks in duration. Following completion, physical activity levels of patients decline. Multi-disease, community-based exercise programmes (MCEP) are an efficient model that could play an important role in the long-term maintenance of positive health behaviours in individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD) following their medically supervised programme. Aim To explore patients experiences of the initiation and early participation in a MCEP programme and the dimensions that facilitate and hinder physical activity engagement. Methods Individuals with established CVD who had completed hospital-based CR were referred to a MCEP. The programme consisted of twice weekly group exercise classes supervised by clinical exercise professionals. Those that completed (n=31) an initial 10 weeks of the programme were invited to attend a focus group to discuss their experience. Focus groups were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Twenty-four (63% male, 65.5±6.12yrs) patients attended one of four focus groups. The main themes identified were ‘Moving from Fear to Confidence’, ‘Drivers of Engagement,’ and ‘Challenges to Keeping it (Exercise) Up’. Conclusion Participation in a MCEP by individuals with CVD could be viewed as a double-edged sword. Whilst the programme clearly provided an important transition from the clinical to the community setting, there were signs it may breed dependency and not effectively promote independent exercise. Another novel finding was the use of social comparison that provided favourable valuations of performance and increased exercise confidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Regan‐Moriarty et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease (n=24). Multi-disease, community-based exercise programme (MCEP) was evaluated on Patient experiences and dimensions that facilitate and hinder physical activity engagement (qualitative themes). Participation in a multi-disease, community-based exercise programme provided an important transition from clinical to community settings and increased exercise confidence among patients with cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: