Why the study?
Stress is harmful and can cause physical and mental illnesses including heart diseases, motivating the design of a model to measure mental stress levels using frontal lobe EEG signals.
Does a machine learning-based model using EEG signals accurately classify mental stress levels in human subjects?
Does a machine learning-based model using EEG signals accurately classify mental stress levels in human subjects?
A majority voting-based ensemble classifier using EEG signals can detect human stress levels with 93.85% accuracy.
May enable EEG-based stress monitoring; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
In the 21st century, a significant portion of the world's population is plagued by stress. Stress is harmful to humans and can cause various physical and mental illnesses, such as headaches, anxiety, depression, and heart diseases. The aim of this study is to design a machine learning-based model to measure the mental stress level of a person using electroencephalography (EEG) signals of the frontal lobe. The proposed stress level assessment technique can classify the stress level of a person into four categories: no stress, low stress, moderate stress, and high stress. In our study, first EEG signals of the subjects have been recorded while they solve four mathematical question sets with different complexity levels. Subsequently, different handcrafted feature extraction techniques have been employed for extracting eight features, namely Skewness, Kurtosis, Maximum, Mean, Mean Absolute Value, Minimum, Standard Deviation, and Power Spectral Density from the pre-processed EEG signals. A majority voting-based ensemble classifier model has been designed by combining the predictions of three different classifiers, i.e., Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest neighbour (KNN), and Naive Bayes, to predict a person's mental stress level. The obtained classification accuracy of the proposed ensemble classifier model is 93.85 %.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Konar et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: