Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently there has been signi cant i n terest in supervised learning algorithms that combine labeled and unlabeled data for text learning tasks. The co-training setting 1] applies to datasets that have a natural separation of their features into two disjoint sets. We demonstrate that when learning from labeled and unlabeled data, algorithms explicitly leveraging a natural independent split of the features outperform algorithms that do not. When a natural split does not exist, co-training algorithms that manufacture a feature split may out-perform algorithms not using a split. These results help explain why co-training algorithms are both discriminative in nature and robust to the assumptions of their embedded classi ers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nigam et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: