Why the study?
Two multiparametric scoring systems have been proposed to diagnose HFpEF, but their performance for predicting exercise capacity and echocardiographic intracardiac pressures during exercise was undetermined.
Do the H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores predict exercise intolerance and abnormal hemodynamics in patients with exertional dyspnea?
Do the H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores predict exercise intolerance and abnormal hemodynamics in patients with exertional dyspnea?
The H2FPEF score is superior to the HFA-PEFF score for predicting reduced aerobic capacity in patients with exertional dyspnea, though both algorithms correlate with abnormal exercise hemodynamics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
H2FPEF may aid stratification of exercise intolerance in dyspnea; leaves open prospective validation versus HFA-PEFF.
Exercise intolerance is a primary manifestation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and is associated with abnormal hemodynamics and a poor quality of life. Two multiparametric scoring systems have been proposed to diagnose HFpEF. This study sought to determine the performance of the H 2 FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores for predicting exercise capacity and echocardiographic findings of intracardiac pressures during exercise in subjects with dyspnea on exertion referred for bicycle stress echocardiography. In a subset, simultaneous expired gas analysis was performed to measure the peak oxygen consumption (VO 2 ). Patients with HFpEF (n = 83) and controls without HF (n = 104) were enrolled. The H 2 FPEF score was obtainable for all patients while the HFA-PEFF score could not be calculated for 23 patients (feasibility 88%). Both H 2 FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores correlated with a higher E/e′ ratio (r = 0.49 and r = 0.46), lower systolic tricuspid annular velocity (r = − 0.44 and = − 0.24), and lower cardiac output (r = − 0.28 and r = − 0.24) during peak exercise. Peak VO 2 and exercise duration decreased with an increase in H 2 FPEF scores (r = − 0.40 and r = − 0.32). The H 2 FPEF score predicted a reduced aerobic capacity (AUC 0.71, p = 0.0005), but the HFA-PEFF score did not ( p = 0.07). These data provide insights into the role of the H 2 FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores for predicting exercise intolerance and abnormal hemodynamics in patients presenting with exertional dyspnea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amanai et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: