Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study local regularity properties of local minimizers of scalar integral functionals of the form <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="script">ℱ</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">[</m:mo> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">]</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo>:=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mo largeop="true" symmetric="true">∫</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>F</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo>∇</m:mo> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>u</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo>-</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mpadded width="+1.7pt"> <m:mi>u</m:mi> </m:mpadded> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>d</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>x</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> F[u]:=∫ΩF(∇ u)-fu\,dx where the convex integrand F satisfies controlled <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>p</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>q</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:math> {(p,q)} -growth conditions. We establish Lipschitz continuity under sharp assumptions on the forcing term f and improved assumptions on the growth conditions on F with respect to the existing literature. Along the way, we establish an <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mi>L</m:mi> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</m:mi> </m:msup> </m:math> {L∞} - <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mi>L</m:mi> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:msup> </m:math> {L²} -estimate for solutions of linear uniformly elliptic equations in divergence form, which is optimal with respect to the ellipticity ratio of the coefficients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bella et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: