Why the study?
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the preventive use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with STEMI and a high risk of no-reflow phenomenon.
Does the preventive use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce the rate of no-reflow in STEMI patients at high risk for the no-reflow phenomenon?
Does the preventive use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce the rate of no-reflow in STEMI patients at high risk for the no-reflow phenomenon?
Preventive administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI patients at high risk of no-reflow significantly reduces the incidence of the no-reflow phenomenon to levels comparable with low-risk patients.
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the preventive use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and a high risk of « no-reflow » phenomenon. Material and Methods . A total of 100 patients were included in the study. For all patients, the risk of no-reflow was calculated using a previously developed scoring system. In case of high risk, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered according to the decision of the interventional cardiologist. The rate of no-reflow as well as the rates of death, recurrent myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis were analyzed. Results. High risk of no-reflow was determined in 37 patients, low risk of no-reflow – in 63 patients. In the high-risk group 22 patients (59.5%) GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were preventively used. In these patients, the frequency of no-reflow was lower compared with high-risk patients who did not receive preventive GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (9.1 vs. 46.7%, p = 0.017). With the preventive use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in high-risk patients, the rates of no-reflow (9.1 vs. 11.1%, p = 1.000) and angiographic success of percutaneous coronary intervention (72.7 vs. 84.1%, p = 0.341) were comparable with low-risk patients. Conclusion. The preventive use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with STEMI and a high risk was associated with reduction of « no-reflow » . In the prophylactic use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with STEMI and a high risk of no-reflow, the results of their treatment were comparable to patients with a low risk of no-reflow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Бессонов et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: