Why the study?
Does point-of-care monitoring of warfarin treatment maintain time in therapeutic range and reduce costs compared to usual monitoring routines in community dwelling elderly patients?
Does point-of-care monitoring of warfarin treatment maintain time in therapeutic range and reduce costs compared to usual monitoring routines in community dwelling elderly patients?
Point-of-care monitoring of warfarin in frail, community-dwelling elderly patients is as effective as usual care for maintaining time in therapeutic range and may offer cost savings.
Supports point-of-care warfarin monitoring in frail elderly patients; confirms similar efficacy with potential cost savings in this RCT.
The objective of this study was to assess clinical effectiveness and costs of launching point-of-care monitoring of warfarin treatment in community dwelling frail elderly patients. A prospective multicentre controlled randomised study over 12 months comparing a point-of-care strategy with usual monitoring routines was carried out in primary healthcare centres and anticoagulation clinics in southeast Sweden. The subjects were community dwelling elderly across rural southeast Sweden on chronic warfarin treatment. Main outcome measures were time in therapeutic range (TTR), rate of treatment-related adverse events and costs. The study comprised 103 elderly people (61% women) mean age 86 yrs (range 75-98) treated with warfarin for median 9 yrs (range 1-18). Patients randomised to start point-of-care monitoring (n = 55) showed 75.9% in TTR before trial vs. 72.6% during trial (ns). The patients randomised to continue on usual monitoring routines (n = 48) showed 75.2% in TTR prior to trial vs. 72.9% during trial (ns). The point-of-care monitoring showed potential savings of SEK 624 per patient annually (based partly on effects that were not statistically significant). The study shows that point-of-care monitoring of warfarin treatment in community dwelling elderly in rural areas is as effective as usual monitoring routines and that it may offer savings to society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidson et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: