Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A shaking table campaign was carried out on a 2:3‐scale, two‐story steel frame structure retrofitted by a dissipative bracing system incorporating pressurized fluid viscous spring‐dampers. Up to 1.16 g peak ground accelerations were imposed in the most severe of the 33 tests developed. The response was always elastic, with maximum interstory drift ratios limited below 0.62%. The protection technology, in fact, features high dissipative capacities and produced equivalent linear viscous damping coefficients up to 37.5%. A numerical enquiry carried out on the test structure in its original unbraced configuration showed interstory drift reductions from about 80% to about 90% when passing to dissipative braced conditions. A final performance‐based analysis developed in terms of interstory drifts and beam and column rotations, in compliance with the criteria formulated in ASCE/SEI 41‐06 Standard, emphasized three through five enhancements of building performance in retrofitted conditions for the four earthquake levels examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sorace et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: