Why the study?
Certain oral selective estrogen receptor degraders have been associated with bradycardia in clinical trials, but the underlying molecular mechanism was unknown.
Do next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (giredestrant and camizestrant) induce bradycardia through direct modulation of estrogen receptors in a preclinical model?
Do next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (giredestrant and camizestrant) induce bradycardia through direct modulation of estrogen receptors in a preclinical model?
Sinus bradycardia associated with next-generation oral SERDs is an on-target adverse effect mediated primarily through nuclear estrogen receptor alpha (esr1) signaling.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May signal on-target bradycardia risk with select SERDs; hypothesis-generating for Esr1 mediation pending human data.
Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) are emerging therapies for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. However, certain oral SERDs, including giredestrant and camizestrant, have been associated with bradycardia in clinical trials. To elucidate the underlying molecular mechanism, we used chemical biology and genetic approaches in a zebrafish model of SERD-induced bradycardia. Giredestrant and camizestrant induced significant bradycardia in wild-type zebrafish embryos, whereas fulvestrant and amcenestrant (SERDs that do not induce bradycardia in patients) did not alter heart rate. Cotreatment with ER agonists rescued bradycardia, suggesting an ER-mediated mechanism. Mutations in gper, esr2a, and esr2b did not confer resistance to SERD-induced bradycardia, whereas esr1 mutant embryos were protected. These findings demonstrate that SERD-associated bradycardia is mediated through Esr1 signaling, supporting an on-target adverse effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: