Why the study?
Abnormal interactions among brain systems are implicated in nicotine addiction, but the relationship between structural covariance networks and smoking severity remains unclear.
Does individualized structural covariance network predict smoking severity in male smokers?
Does individualized structural covariance network predict smoking severity in male smokers?
Individualized structural covariance networks can significantly predict smoking severity, providing new insights into the neural underpinnings of nicotine addiction.
May support network-based prediction of smoking severity; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Introduction: Abnormal interactions among distributed brain systems are implicated in the mechanisms of nicotine addiction. However, the relationship between the structural covariance network, a measure of brain connectivity, and smoking severity remains unclear. To fill this gap, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between structural covariance network and smoking severity in smokers. Methods: A total of 101 male smokers and 51 male non-smokers were recruited, and they underwent a T1-weighted anatomical image scan. First, an individualized structural covariance network was derived via a jackknife-bias estimation procedure for each participant. Then, a data-driven machine learning method called connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) was conducted to infer smoking severity measured with Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) scores using an individualized structural covariance network. The performance of CPM was evaluated using the leave-one-out cross-validation and a permutation testing. Results: = 0.020). Identified networks comprised of edges mainly located between the subcortical-cerebellum network and networks including the frontoparietal default model and motor and visual networks. Discussion: These results identified smoking severity-related structural covariance networks and provided a new insight into the neural underpinnings of smoking severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: