Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The evidence base in health professions education continues to accumulate at an unprecedented rate. Summaries of evidence in the form of scoping, systematic and narrative reviews are also increasingly common. Unfortunately, many submissions go unpublished and for reasons that may be irreversible post-peer review. The goal of this commentary is to offer insights to review authors for improving the likelihood of publication success. These tips will not guarantee success; however, insights address common errors authors make along the continuum of review production that result in either requests for major revision or rejection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanya Horsley (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: