Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
This study evaluated the impact of a Cambridge hospital at home service (CHAH) on patients' quality of care, likelihood of remaining at home in their final 2 weeks of life and general practitioner (GP) visits. The design was a randomized controlled trial, comparing CHAH with standard care. The patient's district nurse, GP and informal carer were surveyed within 6 weeks of patient's death, and 225 district nurses, 194 GPs and 144 informal carers of 229 patients responded. There was no clear evidence that CHAH increased likelihood of remaining at home during the final 2 weeks of life. However, the service was associated with fewer GP out of hours visits. All respondent groups rated CHAH favourably compared to standard care but emphasized different aspects. District nurses rated CHAH as better than standard care in terms of adequacy of night care and support for the carer, GPs in terms of anxiety and depression, and informal carers in terms of control of pain and nausea. Thus whilst CHAH was not found to increase the likelihood of remaining at home, at appeared to be associated with better quality home care.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gunn Grande
University of Manchester
Chris Todd
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
Stephen Barclay
Primary Health Care
Palliative Medicine
University of Cambridge
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Grande et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10320d92676d5461fdb160 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/026921600701536200
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: