Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The EU has long been recognised as a complex security actor with competences across a variety of security-relevant issues. These competences add up to a form of security governance, the purpose of which is to guard against a multiplicity of threats. How threats (and, for that matter, risks) are defined can be seen as the outcome of processes of securitisation where authoritative actors articulate a logic of security – discursively constructing threats and initiating policies in response. This article argues that it is possible for securitisation to occur in a ‘collective’ setting such as the EU. It articulates a framework through which collective securitisation can be understood – one that is then applied in a series of cases in the remainder of the Special Issue. The ability of the EU to mobilise effort in this regard suggests a resilience overlooked in much of the recent discussion of European crisis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sperling et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: