Why the study?
Myocardial ischemia triggers tissue injury, inflammation, and immune cell recruitment, which might be evaluated directly after ischemia/reperfusion using advanced MRI and molecular imaging.
Does P-selectin MPIO contrast agent with iron-sensitive MRI improve the detection of early myocardial inflammation compared to traditional edema-sensitive MRI in a porcine ischemia/reperfusion model?
Does P-selectin MPIO contrast agent with iron-sensitive MRI improve the detection of early myocardial inflammation compared to traditional edema-sensitive MRI in a porcine ischemia/reperfusion model?
Molecular MRI targeting P-selectin with MPIO contrast agents enables early detection of myocardial inflammation post-ischemia, outperforming traditional edema-sensitive imaging.
Supports preclinical testing of P-selectin MPIO MRI for early inflammation; leaves open human translation.
Myocardial ischemia induces tissue injury with subsequent inflammation and recruitment of immune cells. Besides myocardial tissue characterization, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows for functional assessment using molecular imaging contrast agents. Here, we assessed ischemic cardiac lesions non-invasively directly after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) in a porcine model by advanced MRI techniques and molecular imaging, targeting the cell adhesion molecule P-selectin functionalized with microparticles of iron oxide (MPIO). We used a closed-chest model of I/R by temporary coronary balloon-occlusion, real time 3T MRI-guided coronary injection of MPIO-based contrast agents, as well as injury, edema and iron-sensitive MRI. Within the first hours after I/R, we found T1 mapping to be most sensitive for tissue injury, with no changes in edema-sensitive MRI. Intriguingly, P-selectin MPIO contrast agent selectively enhanced the ischemic area in iron-sensitive MRI. In conclusion, this approach allows for sensitive detection of early myocardial inflammation beyond traditional edema-sensitive imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heidt et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: