Why the study?
Aortic valve replacement leads to left ventricular remodeling, but whether post-AVR changes in dynamic LV function or aortic valve characteristics relate to LV mass regression remained unexplored.
Does post-AVR improvement in dynamic LV function assessed by strain-volume loops relate to LV mass regression in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Does post-AVR improvement in dynamic LV function assessed by strain-volume loops relate to LV mass regression in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Post-AVR improvements in dynamic LV function, assessed by strain-volume loops, are significantly associated with long-term reverse remodeling and LV mass regression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Post-AVR ε-volume loop coherence gains were associated with LV mass regression; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice in severe AS.
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) leads to remodeling of the left ventricle (LV). Adopting a novel technique to examine dynamic LV function, our study explored whether post-AVR changes in dynamic LV function and/or changes in aortic valve characteristics are associated with LV mass regression during follow-up. We retrospectively analyzed 30 participants with severe aortic stenosis who underwent standard transthoracic echocardiographic assessment before AVR [88 (IQR or interquartile range: 22–143) days], post-AVR [13 (6–22) days], and during follow-up [455 (226–907) days]. We assessed standard measures of LV structure, function, and aortic valve characteristics. Novel insight into dynamic LV function was provided through a four-chamber image by examination of the temporal relation between LV longitudinal strain (ε) and volume (ε-volume loops), representing the contribution of LV mechanics to volume change. AVR resulted in immediate changes in structural valve characteristics, alongside a reduced LV longitudinal peak ε and improved coherence between the diastolic and systolic part of the ε-volume loop (all P < 0.05). Follow-up revealed a decrease in LV mass ( P < 0.05) and improvements in LV ejection fraction and LV longitudinal peak ε ( P < 0.05). A significant relationship was present between decline in LV mass during follow-up and post-AVR improvement in coherence of the ε-volume loops ( r = 0.439, P = 0.03), but not with post-AVR changes in aortic valve characteristics or LV function (all P > 0.05). We found that post-AVR improvements in dynamic LV function are related to long-term remodeling of the LV. This highlights the potential importance of assessing dynamic LV function for cardiac adaptations in vivo. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Combining temporal measures of left ventricular longitudinal strain and volume (strain-volume loop) provides novel insights in dynamic cardiac function. In patients with aortic stenosis who underwent aortic valve replacement, postsurgical changes in the strain-volume loop are associated with regression of left ventricular mass during follow-up. This provides novel insight into the relation between postsurgery changes in cardiac hemodynamics and long-term structural remodeling, but also supports the potential utility of the assessment of dynamic cardiac function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hulshof et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: