Why the study?
It was unknown how reverse remodeling from early versus late-stage LVH affects different aspects of left ventricular function, given that structural alterations become less reversible during LVH progression.
Does early versus late pressure unloading improve structural reverse remodeling and left ventricular function in rats with pressure overload-induced LVH?
Does early versus late pressure unloading improve structural reverse remodeling and left ventricular function in rats with pressure overload-induced LVH?
In a rat model of pressure overload, early but not late pressure unloading leads to complete structural reverse remodeling and full restoration of diastolic function, highlighting the importance of early intervention in LVH.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights timing-dependent reverse remodeling in experimental LVH; hypothesis-generating for early unloading in clinical hypertensive heart disease.
OBJECTIVE: Pressure overload-induced left ventricular myocardial hypertrophy (LVH) regresses after pressure unloading. However, distinct structural alterations become less reversible during the progression of LVH, which might influence the restoration of cardiac function. Here, we investigated how a reverse remodeling process from early versus late-stage LVH affects different aspects of left ventricular function. METHODS: Pressure overload was induced in rats for 6, 12 and 18 weeks. Sham-operated animals were used as controls. Pressure unloading was evoked by removing the aortic constriction at week 6 (early-debanded) and week 12 (late-debanded). Echocardiography and histological analyses were carried out to detect structural alterations. Pressure-volume analysis was performed to assess left ventricular function. Molecular alterations were analyzed by quantitative real-time-PCR, and western blot. RESULTS: Myocardial hypertrophy regressed to a similar degree in early and late-debanded groups. Accordingly, no differences were detected in the extent of regression regarding left ventricular mass, cardiomyocyte diameter, heart weight-to-tibial length ratio and beta-to-alpha myosin heavy chain expression. In contrast, resorption of interstitial and perivascular myocardial fibrosis was only detected in the early-debanded group, whereas it persisted in the late-debanded group. Removing the aortic constriction normalized ventriculo-arterial coupling and increased systolic performance in both debanded groups. However, the residual dysfunction in active relaxation and passive stiffness was more severe in the late-debanded compared to the early-debanded group. CONCLUSION: Early debanding led to complete structural reverse remodeling (reduced hypertrophy and fibrosis) and full restoration of left ventricular function. In contrast, myocardial fibrosis persisted after late debanding, which impeded the normalization of diastolic but not systolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruppert et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: