Key result
Radial pressure wave decomposition strongly correlates with measured cfPTT, enabling noninvasive arterial stiffness assessment.
Why the study?
Carotid-femoral pulse transit time (cfPTT) assesses central arterial stiffness but commonly requires measuring two synchronized pressure waves, which is technically challenging.
Does radial pressure wave decomposition accurately estimate carotid-femoral pulse transit time in healthy adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=151)
No
Does radial pressure wave decomposition accurately estimate carotid-femoral pulse transit time in healthy adults?
Arterial stiffness can be directly and accurately estimated from a noninvasively measured radial pressure wave using a double triangular flow wave decomposition method.
Supports noninvasive stiffness estimation from radial waveforms; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Carotid-femoral pulse transit time (cfPTT) is a widely accepted measure of central arterial stiffness. The cfPTT is commonly calculated from two synchronized pressure waves. However, measurement of synchronized pressure waves is technically challenging. In this paper, a method of decomposing the radial pressure wave is proposed for estimating cfPTT. From the radial pressure wave alone, the pressure wave can be decomposed into forward and backward waves by fitting a double triangular flow wave. The first zero point of the second derivative of the radial pressure wave and the peak of the dicrotic segment of radial pressure wave are used as the peaks of the fitted double triangular flow wave. The correlation coefficient between the measured wave and the estimated forward and backward waves based on the decomposition of the radial pressure wave was 0.98 and 0.75, respectively. Then from the backward wave, cfPTT can be estimated. Because it has been verified that the time lag estimation based on of backward wave has strong correlation with the measured cfPTT. The corresponding regression function between the time lag estimation of backward wave and measured cfPTT is y = 0.96x + 5.50 (r = 0.77; p < 0.001). The estimated cfPTT using radial pressure wave decomposition based on the proposed double triangular flow wave is more accurate and convenient than the decomposition of the aortic pressure wave based on the triangular flow wave. The significance of this study is that arterial stiffness can be directly estimated from a noninvasively measured radial pressure wave.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy adults (n=151). Radial pressure wave decomposition (double triangular flow wave method) vs. Measured carotid-femoral pulse transit time (cfPTT) was evaluated on Correlation between calculated time lag of backward wave (T-reflection/2.8) and measured cfPTT (r = 0.77, p=<0.001). Estimation of carotid-femoral pulse transit time using radial pressure wave decomposition strongly correlated with measured transit time (r = 0.77, p < 0.001), enabling noninvasive arterial stiffness assessment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: