Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article analyses how gendered, racialised and classed antagonisms are created in texts by radical right-wing populists and intellectuals connected to the anti-immigration movement and the antifeminist men’s rights movement in Finland. The studied rhetoric focuses on the reproduction of the “white nation” as part of the endangered “Western civilisation”; a feminism “gone too far” and shifts in heterosexual power relations in the postcolonial era. The rhetoric is discussed as political reimaginations that aim to recentre white masculinity in a society that has seen its self-evident and normative position questioned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suvi Keskinen (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: