Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Faculty and academic institutions face significant challenges in delivering effective ambulatory-care teaching to house staff and medical students. The effects of a faculty-development program on individual ambulatory-care faculty's knowledge, skills, and attitudes; and on participants' recommendations for improving the ambulatory-care environment were examined. The faculty development program trained faculty in either clinical teaching (CT), medical decision making (MDM), or preventive medicine (PM). Ten facilitators implemented a faculty-development program for 64 ambulatory-care faculty. On a 5-point scale (1 = definitely not, 5 = definitely yes), participants rated the usefulness of the seminars as 4.8 or greater. For the CT seminars, statistically significant pre- to post-intervention improvements were found for all seven categories of teaching skills covered (p< 0.001). For the MDM seminars, the participants' content knowledge increased from a pretest mean of 49% correct to a posttest mean of 70% correct (p = 0.01). Participants formulated 45 recommendations for improving the ambulatory-care setting; approximately one-half of these recommendations had been implemented by the institutions 6 months after completion of the program. Faculty-development programs improve the skills of individual faculty and may provide a method for generating recommendations to improve ambulatory-care education and patient care at the institutional level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stratos et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: