Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mean light curves of Type I, II-P ("plateau"), and II-L ("linear") supernovae are plotted on a common scale and directly compared. The Type II-P light curve has a distinctive shape, but the shape of Type II-L bears a resemblance to that of Type I in both the B and V bands. The similarity raises the question of whether the underlying physics of Type II-L explosions is more like that of Type I than like that of Type II-P, contrary to the usual assumption. It is shown that for Tycho's and Kepler's supernovae, light-curve shape cannot distinguish between a Type I and Type II-L classification. The light curves of the principal examples of Zwicky's Type III, IV, and V supernovae are compared directly to the mean light curves of the main types. The authors suggest that these supernovae be referred to as II-pec, for "Type II peculiar".
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doggett et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: