Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This conceptual paper examines how Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) can be repositioned within digitally-enhanced global classrooms to advance epistemic justice and curriculum relevance in South African higher education. A critical-interpretive conceptual design combines an integrative literature review (2013–2025), with illustrative South African cases in Technology Education and higher-education internationalisation. Sources include peer-reviewed scholarship, national policy, and scholarly books, synthesised through three lenses, epistemic justice, decoloniality, and Ubuntu-informed self-directed learning. Eurocentric defaults in digital pedagogy risk reproducing exclusions; a hybrid framework integrating IKS with 4IR tools (AI, AR, OER) enables multilingual, community-embedded, and ethically grounded curriculum design. Enablers include policy alignment, capacitation of academics, ethical protocols for Indigenous intellectual property, and South–South collaborations. Targeted actions are proposed for DHET/CHE (epistemic-diversity criteria in QA/accreditation), universities (governance, funding, digital inclusion), curriculum committees (IKS-aligned review rubrics), academics (culturally responsive, multilingual digital pedagogies), EdTech partners (co-design with communities), and funders (IKS-centred digital archives/infrastructure). The paper offers a theoretically coherent hybrid knowledge framework and a policy-to-practice roadmap connecting IKS, digital pedagogy, and curriculum internationalisation, thereby advancing scholarship on epistemic justice in global higher education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benjamin Seleke (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: