Key result
Surgical residents use online risk calculators more than faculty despite low ~21% overall routine use.
Why the study?
Formal surgical risk assessment tools improve care and decision-making but remain underutilized, prompting an evaluation of surgeons' attitudes and techniques regarding preoperative risk assessment.
What are the attitudes and usage rates of preoperative risk assessment tools among surgeons and surgical residents?
Cross-Sectional (n=120)
Yes
What are the attitudes and usage rates of preoperative risk assessment tools among surgeons and surgical residents?
Absolute Event Rate: 62.2% vs 49.4%
p-value: p=0.002
Despite their availability, preoperative surgical risk calculators are underutilized by surgeons in routine practice due to barriers such as time constraints, inaccessibility, and lack of trust in their accuracy.
BACKGROUND: Formal surgical risk assessment tools have been developed to predict risk of adverse postoperative patient outcomes. Such tools accurately predict common postoperative complications, inform patients and providers of likely perioperative outcomes, guide decision making, and improve patient care. However, these are underutilized. We studied the attitudes towards and techniques of how surgeons preoperatively assess risk. METHODS: Surgeons at a large academic tertiary referral hospital and affiliate community hospitals were emailed a 16-question survey via REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) between 8/2019-6/2020. Reminder emails were sent once weekly for three weeks. All completed surveys by surgical residents and attendings were included; incomplete surveys were excluded. Surveys were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequency distributions and percentages for categorical variables, means, and standard deviations for continuous variables), and Fisher's exact test and unpaired t-tests comparing responses by surgical attendings vs. residents. RESULTS: A total of 108 surgical faculty, 95 surgical residents, and 58 affiliate surgeons were emailed the survey. Overall response rates were 50.0% for faculty surgeons, 47.4% for residents, and 36.2% for affiliate surgeons. Only 20.8% of surgeons used risk calculators most or all of the time. Attending surgeons were more likely to use prior experience and current literature while residents used risk calculators more frequently. Risk assessment tools were more likely to be used when predicting major complications and death in older patients with significant risk factors. Greatest barriers for use of risk assessment tools included time, inaccessibility, and trust in accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: A small percentage of surgeons use surgical risk calculators as part of their routine practice. Time, inaccessibility, and trust in accuracy were the most significant barriers to use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pradhan et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Surgeons' attitudes towards preoperative risk assessment tools (n=120). Surgical residents vs. Faculty and affiliated surgeons was evaluated on Use of online risk calculators (sometimes to always) (p=0.002). Surgical residents used online risk calculators more frequently than faculty and affiliated surgeons (62.2% vs 49.4%), though overall routine use among all surgeons remained low at 20.8%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: