Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To describe the utilisation of an emergency team that employs standardised calling criteria to facilitate the early identification and resuscitation of patients who are at risk of cardiorespiratory arrest. Design: A prospective study of all Medical Emergency Team calls over a six-month period in 1994. Setting: A 460-bed university teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia. Subjects: Inpatients and outpatients who required Medical Emergency Team intervention. Interventions: None. Endpoints: Unplanned admission to critical care units, mortality. Measurements and main results: There was a total of 294 calls, of which 53% occurred on the wards and 31% in the Emergency Department. Cardiac arrests accounted for 24% of responses. Abnormal physiological variables were a factor in 60% of calls. Decreased level of consciousness occurred in 46% of cases. Fifty-three calls necessitated admission of patients to critical care units, of which 32 (60%) survived to hospital discharge. The mortality rate at hospital discharge was higher in cardiac arrests (84%) than other medical emergencies (27%)(χ2=51.24; p<0.01). Conclusions: The Medical Emergency Team is well employed as an early intervention team, with abnormal physiological variables alerting the team in many cases. A standardised team approach encouraging early medical intervention in 'at-risk' patients may potentially reduce the high morbidity and mortality associated with the seriously ill and those at risk from cardiac arrest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hourihan et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: