In this paper, we analyze how our evaluation of the capacity of a rainfall‐runoff model to represent low or high flows depends on the objective function used during the calibration process. We present a method to combine models to produce a more satisfactory streamflow simulation, on the basis of two different parameterizations of the same model. Where we previously had to choose between a more efficient simulation for either high flows or low flows (but inevitably less efficient in the other range), we show that a balanced simulation can be obtained by using a seasonal index to weigh the two simulations, providing good efficiency in both low and high flows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oudin et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: