This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Implicit models separate the definition of a layer from the description of its solution process. While implicit layers allow features such as depth to adapt automatically to new scenarios and inputs, this adaptivity makes its computational expense challenging to predict. In this manuscript, we increase the “implicitness” of the DEQ by redefining the method in terms of an infinite time neural ODE, which paradoxically decreases the training cost over a standard neural ODE by <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2-4×</tex> . Additionally, we address the question: is there a way to simultaneously achieve the robustness of implicit layers while allowing the reduced computational expense of an explicit layer? To solve this, we develop Skip and Skip Reg. DEQ, an implicit-explicit (IMEX) layer that simultaneously trains an explicit prediction followed by an implicit correction. We show that training this explicit predictor is free and even decreases the training time by <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1.11-3.19×</tex> . Together, this manuscript shows how bridging the dichotomy of implicit and explicit deep learning can combine the advantages of both techniques.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pal et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: