Why the study?
While research has explored the physiological side of punch drunk syndrome, far less work has considered how boxers experience brain injuries, with socio-cultural explorations largely lacking theoretically nuanced discussions of such phenomena.
This sociological analysis highlights how boxers' embodied engagement and cultural norms lead them to normalize and manage neurological disruptions, often dismissing medical advice.
Alerts clinicians to boxers' potential minimization of neurological symptoms; extends sociological understanding of risk normalization but leaves clinical adoption open.
Boxing is ‘all about bodies’; beautiful bodies, broken bodies and, sometimes, brain-damaged bodies. And while a lot of research has explored the physiological side of ‘punch drunk’ syndrome, far less work has attempted to consider how boxers experience brain injuries. Perhaps surprisingly, considering the sports historical and symbolic ties to concussion and degenerative brain diseases, contemporary socio-cultural explorations of the sport tend to be largely devoid of theoretically nuanced discussions of such phenomena. Within this paper, as a means of partly addressing this issue, I examine the ‘bodily negotiations’ that were part of personal understandings of ‘brain injuries’. By considering the manner that such embodied knowhow is shaped by risky notions about the body, I demonstrate how culturally specific competent bodily actions are developed. Such an analysis provides insights into the ways that boxers might symbolically neutralise, pragmatically manage or ‘fight through’ what they considered to be relatively ‘run of the mill’ neurological disruption. This helps to demonstrate how their embodied engagement provides the basis by which ‘outsider’ knowledge, including that provided by medical personnel, might be largely excluded and otherwise diminished.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher R. Matthews (2020) studied this question.