Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study evaluates how environmental regulation influences enterprise management practices in the YREB of China, which faces a dilemma between economic growth and ecological conservation. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines, a qualitative systematic review of empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 was conducted. The data were retrieved via Web of Science and Scopus, supplemented by Google Scholar and ScienceDirect. Subsequently, thematic analysis and data visualization were conducted by MAXQDA 2024. The findings synthesize evidence across key themes, environmental information disclosure (EID), green innovation, governance adaptation, and regional disparity themes to synthesize key empirical findings. From the perspectives of Institutional Theory and Stakeholder Theory, the findings suggest that environmental regulation is not only a compliance burden, but also a force for enterprise change, driving EID practices and innovation-oriented competitive advantages. The results further suggest that when institutions are more developed or policy implementation is more stable, enterprises are better able to adjust, implying that downstream regions are more flexible than upstream regions. Other instruments to close the implementation gap and support sustainable development are multi-level governance, context-specific policy instruments, and Integrated Water Resource Management. Also, it may be highlighted that effectiveness in environmental governance relies on governance quality, institutional capacities, and regionally differentiated aspects. Future research should better identify causal mechanisms and improve cross-region learning to improve equitable and effective environmental governance in China’s evolving socio-ecological context.
He et al. (Thu,) studied this question.