Key result
The 11+ injury prevention program faces limited adherence, driving stakeholder desire for greater variety and integration.
Why the study?
To investigate the experience with the 11+, attitudes towards injury prevention, and potential improvements to the 11+ and the delivery of injury prevention strategies within football.
Stakeholders in New Zealand football suggest improving the 11+ injury prevention program by adding variety, football-specific elements, and integrating it throughout training sessions to improve adherence.
Stakeholder views on 11+ barriers may inform program tweaks in football; leaves open whether modifications boost adherence in trials.
The aim of this study was to investigate the experience with the 11+, attitudes towards injury prevention, and potential improvements to the 11+ and the delivery of injury prevention strategies within football. A qualitative study design was used to investigate the views of four stakeholder groups (players, coaches, strength and conditioning staff and clinicians). Twenty-two adults participated (nine women; median age 35.5 years). Participants were purposively recruited and were based in New Zealand. They represented various levels of football, including different genders, ages and levels of play. Focus group interviews were conducted, which were recorded, transcribed and subject to thematic analysis. Four key themes were identified: understanding of the 11+ injury prevention warm-up, content of an ideal injury prevention programme, structure of the programme and education, adherence and dissemination. The study found that while participants appeared to have good awareness of the existing 11+ programme and an interest in injury prevention, adherence and enthusiasm towards the programme was limited. Participants highlighted a number of elements that may help shape the development of a new injury prevention strategy, including a desire to retain many of the elements of the 11+ and to have a proven programme. Participants wanted greater variety, more football-specific elements and to implement a new strategy throughout a session, rather than being seen as a stand-alone warm-up. Whether the intervention should also include strength-based exercises, or whether this should be promoted outside of a football training session, was less certain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winstanley et al. (2023) studied Football injury prevention (n=22). 11+ injury prevention programme was evaluated on Stakeholder views on the 11+ programme and potential improvements. Qualitative evaluation of the 11+ injury prevention programme among 22 stakeholders revealed limited adherence and a desire for greater variety and integration throughout football training sessions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: