Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, we present a characterization of serving traces collected from Public Al's serving of Apertus, an open source Large Language Model (LLM). The trace spans roughly five months (September 2025-January 2026) and contains 337K requests. We analyzed request sizes, token and timing behaviour, latency, model-size effects, and temporal patterns. Our findings show insights that do not align with common assumptions; (1) time-to-first-token is often driven by queuing rather than prefill compute, especially for small requests; (2) the 8B and 70B models show nearly the same user-perceived latency despite a 9× parameter gap; (3) a substantial fraction of requests are prefill/queuing-dominated rather than decode-dominated; and; (4) observable input features are weak predictors of output, which makes size-aware scheduling difficult at arrival time. As a contribution to the research community, we will publish this anonymized trace along with its analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demiray et al. (2026) studied this question.