Why the study?
Does current and emerging antithrombotic therapy improve outcomes in geriatric patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does current and emerging antithrombotic therapy improve outcomes in geriatric patients with acute coronary syndrome?
There is a critical need for dedicated randomized clinical trials to evaluate antithrombotic therapies in elderly ACS patients, who face high risks of both ischemia and bleeding.
Elderly ACS patients warrant individualized antithrombotic decisions given dual risks; dedicated RCTs needed to clarify net benefit.
INTRODUCTION: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) represent one of the most perilous presentations of ischemic heart disease. Temporal trends clearly demonstrate that ACS occur later and later in life. Elderly patients with ACS comprise a populous and growing group, with more than half of individuals presenting with myocardial infarction being 75 years or older. Nevertheless, geriatric patients are greatly underrepresented in the landmark ACS trials evaluating innovative pharmacological strategies. AREAS COVERED: The authors critically summarize recently published research on contemporary and emerging antithrombotic therapy for the treatment of ACS in geriatric patients. EXPERT OPINION: Elderly ACS patients are characterized by simultaneously increased risk of cardiovascular events and bleeding. Very few studies assessing the efficacy and safety of novel ACS pharmacotherapy in geriatric patients are currently available. Guidelines on the treatment of ACS are based on the overall results of major randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and data supporting the recommended therapy in elderly mainly derive from subanalyses of these RCTs. Properly designed and powered RCTs are necessary to properly evaluate the net effect of current and emerging pharmacotherapy in geriatric patients. Until such data are available, elderly ACS patients should receive treatment according to the general recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adamski et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: