Key result
Poor cardiovascular risk profiles in non-elderly adults are linked to ~3.5-fold higher all-cause mortality.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the association between cardiovascular risk factor profiles and premature all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality among US adults aged < 65 years.
Does a poor cardiovascular risk factor profile increase the risk of premature all-cause and CVD mortality in non-elderly US adults?
Cohort (n=195,901)
Does a poor cardiovascular risk factor profile increase the risk of premature all-cause and CVD mortality in non-elderly US adults?
Effect estimate: aHR 3.48 (95% CI 2.96-4.10)
Absolute Event Rate: 838.7% vs 177%
Non-elderly US adults with a poor cardiovascular risk factor profile have a 3.5 to 5-fold higher risk of premature all-cause and CVD mortality compared to those with an optimal profile.
Emphasizes early risk factor control in non-elderly adults; extends observational data yet leaves causal effects and practice change open.
Objective To assess the association between cardiovascular risk factor (CRF) profile and premature all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality among US adults (age < 65). Methods This study used data from the National Health Interview Survey from 2006 to 2014, linked to the National Death Index for non-elderly adults aged < 65 years. A composite CRF score (range = 0–6) was calculated, based on the presence or absence of six established cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, obesity, and insufficient physical activity. CRF profile was defined as “Poor” (≥ 3 risk factors), “Average” (1–2), or “Optimal” (0 risk factors). Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) were reported across CRF profile categories, separately for all-cause and CVD mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association between CRF profile and all-cause and CVD mortality. Results Among 195,901 non-elderly individuals (mean age: 40.4 ± 13.0, 50% females and 70% Non-Hispanic (NH) White adults), 24.8% had optimal, 58.9% average, and 16.2% poor CRF profiles, respectively. Participants with poor CRF profile were more likely to be NH Black, have lower educational attainment and lower income compared to those with optimal CRF profile. All-cause and CVD mortality rates were three to four fold higher in individuals with poor CRF profile, compared to their optimal profile counterparts. Adults with poor CRF profile experienced 3.5-fold (aHR: 3.48 [95% CI: 2.96, 4.10]) and 5-fold (aHR: 4.76 [3.44, 6.60]) higher risk of all-cause and CVD mortality, respectively, compared to those with optimal profile. These results were consistent across age, sex, and race/ethnicity subgroups. Conclusions In this population-based study, non-elderly adults with poor CRF profile had a three to five-fold higher risk of all-cause and CVD mortality, compared to those with optimal CRF profile. Targeted prevention efforts to achieve optimal cardiovascular risk profile are imperative to reduce the persistent burden of premature all-cause and CVD mortality in the US.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular risk profile (n=195,901). Poor cardiovascular risk profile (≥ 3 risk factors) vs. Optimal cardiovascular risk profile (0 risk factors) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (aHR 3.48, 95% CI 2.96-4.10). Non-elderly adults with a poor cardiovascular risk profile had a 3.5-fold higher risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 3.48) and a 4.8-fold higher risk of CVD mortality (aHR 4.76) compared to those with an optimal profile.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: