A theory is proposed that unites the universal locative paradigm consisting of the predicate locative, the existential, and the ‘have’ predication. This is accomplished by deriving all three from a single underlying structure in which a preposition is the head of the predicate phrase. The existential and the ‘have’ structure, both having a derived locative subject, are differentiated from the predicate locative by the definiteness effect. ‘Have’ predications of various kinds, including those with ‘have’ copulas, are claimed to differ from existentials because their locative constituent contains a [+human] argument. Apparently disparate facts from many languages are accounted for and a general explanation is offered for the distinction between a ‘have’ copula and a ‘be’ copula.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ray A. Freeze (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: