Tracking, the sorting and grouping of students in schools, has been criticized for separating students along race and class lines, re-segregating diverse schools and perpetuating unequal access to a college-bound curriculum. Detracking, a reform in which students are placed intentionally in mixed-ability classes, is an attempt to remedy the negative effects of tracking. In this "think piece," the authors review the relevant literature and reflect upon their experiences teaching and researching in detracked classrooms, presenting several dilemmas apparent within detracked classrooms and identifying a number of practices that have proven successful at meeting students' needs in these classrooms. The authors argue that if detracking is to achieve its aims, it must be part of more comprehensive reform aimed at the equitable redistribution of resources and opportunities within schools, deliberately placing the needs of previously underserved students at the center of reform initiatives. Notes 1. Because this article's conclusions are drawn from our collective reflections, there is no consistent data gathering methodology. Presentation of data in this article is primarily intended to highlight and illustrate our points, rather than to prove them empirically. For descriptions of CitationRubin's systematic research conducted on detracking see Rubin (2003b) and CitationRubin (2003c).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rubin et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: