Why the study?
What is the rate of inappropriate invasive cardiovascular interventions (PTCA, CABG, CEA) in German hospitals according to RAND criteria?
What is the rate of inappropriate invasive cardiovascular interventions (PTCA, CABG, CEA) in German hospitals according to RAND criteria?
Despite high per capita rates of invasive cardiovascular interventions in Germany, the rate of overtly inappropriate procedures is low, though pre-interventional stress testing appears underutilized.
Low inappropriateness rates support current German practice patterns; observational data leave open effects of 42% uncertain classifications.
OBJECTIVE: Germany has the highest per capita rate of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (PTCAs) in Europe and the third highest per capita rate of heart surgeries requiring a heart-lung machine. The goal of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of PTCA, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in German hospitals using RAND appropriateness criteria. METHODS: A retrospective study in 121 randomly selected German hospitals (52% of all hospitals contacted) was performed from December 2000 to August 2001. A total of 361 patients were enrolled providing information on the appropriateness of 128 PTCAs, 92 CABGs, and 141 CEAs. RESULTS: Inappropriateness rates were 2% (95% CI 0-5%), 4% (95% CI 1-9%), and 3% (95% CI 1-7%) for PTCA, CABG, and CEA, respectively. The overall rate of uncertain procedures was 42% (95% CI 36-47%). Only 38% (95% CI 32-45%) of patients who received a coronary intervention had had a pre-interventional stress test. CONCLUSIONS: The study yielded little overt overuse in the performance of PTCAs, CABGs, and CEAs, but potentially large underuse of stress tests. Despite a high per capita rate of invasive cardiovascular interventions in Germany, the rate of inappropriate procedures was not larger than in other countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gandjour et al. (2003) studied this question.