PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 14, 2021Foreign Policy Analysis42 citationsOpen Access

Constructing National Values: The Nationally Distinctive Turn in Russian IR Theory and Foreign Policy

View Full Paper
ATAndreï P. TsygankovSan Francisco State UniversityПЦП.А. ЦыганковLomonosov Moscow State University

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore how distinct schools of IR theory in Russia emphasize national values in shaping foreign policy.
  • Analyzed various schools of IR theory in Russia including Civilizationists, Statists, and Westernizers.
  • Examined the impact of ontological insecurity and the Russian state on foreign policy development.
  • Discussed the contributions of Western actions to national identity and security concerns.
  • Identified a growing emphasis on national values among different IR schools in Russia.
  • Demonstrated that ontological insecurity drives a distinctive Russian approach to foreign policy.
  • Showed that internal and external factors shape the understanding of national values within IR theory.

Abstract

Abstract As the world moves away from the West-centered international system, IR scholars are increasingly turning their attention to substance and formation of national values. Using the case of Russia, we show how distinct schools of IR theory and foreign policy dominant in the country have come to recognize the importance of national values as a lens through which to assess the country's means and goals of development. Each in its way, these schools—Civilizationists, Statists, and Westernizers—have prioritized “the national” in the country's future. We explain Russia's turn to the national by stressing the country's ontological insecurity, the role of the Russian state, and Western actions that contribute to creating and exacerbating the conditions of ontological insecurity. The case of Russia has important implications for understanding the role of national values in the formation of foreign policy and IR theory.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tsygankov et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1094db4fb650da4fffacefhttps://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orab022
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity2013 · 273 citations
  2. 2A Structuralist Approach to the Economic Trajectories of Russia and the Countries of East-Central Europe since 19002013 · 11 citations
  3. 3The Social Self In International Relations: Identity, Power and the Rediscovery of Constructivism’s Symbolic Interactionist Roots2017 · 31 citations
  4. 4The New Liberalism2009 · 68 citations
  5. 5The Civilizational Turn in Russian Political Discourse: From Pan‐Europeanism to Civilizational Distinctiveness2016 · 68 citations