As Senior Editor of the IS Research Perspectives Section of the Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), I am often asked about the section; in particular about the kinds of papers that are or are not appropriate, how we decide what is and is not appropriate, and, specifically, how we evaluate the submissions we receive.It is on the last point I would like to offer some thoughts, as evaluating the kinds of submissions we receive is challenging to say the least.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rudy Hirschheim (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: